The Great Shock of April 15th

This tax season I encountered a record number of business owners that were outright shocked to find out how much they owed for 2014 taxes. There are a few common questions I keep hearing.

#1 – How Did I End Up Owing Money?

There are four key areas that contributed this year to so many companies owing:

  1. Surprise Profitability
    The last several years have been decent if you’re lucky but dismal for most. This caused most companies to pull back on quarterly tax prepayments, or often eliminate them altogether.
  2. 2014 Was Better Than Expected
    There is no question that 2014 started an upswing that is continuing to get stronger with each passing quarter (even for those companies have yet to feel the impact of that upswing). Once income began to flow again, many businesses were forced to make capital investments that were years overdue. This means that although 2014 was in fact more profitable, it wasn’t “felt” by many Owners. Not all investments may be written off in the current year. Even if the bank account hasn’t recovered, the P&L sheets have and additionally the IRS considers many to be profitable and out of AMT. Even if the bank accounts don’t reflect the same.
  3. Tax Breaks Disappeared
    Without many major tax breaks that companies have not only come to enjoy, but have come to count on, many are finding themselves with unexpected increases to their tax liabilities.
  4. Tax Rates Increasing
    Tax rates have increased, for example; the recent Personal Limit increase to 40% and Capital Gains increasing from 15% – 25%.

#2 – Why Didn’t My CPA Warn Me?

Many owners are left wondering:

  • Did my CPA let me down?
  • Why didn’t they prepare me for this?

The reality is, your CPA only knows the information you provide to them And for most of us business Owners we don’t do our CPAs any favors. As Owners we know this, and if we are honest we’ll admit that we just don’t take the time necessary to discuss an overall tax strategy with our CPA.

Yesterday I spoke with one CPA that was completely unaware that their Client had purchased an additional building (over $2M in cost), and another CPA that upon delivery of our Cost Segregation report didn’t understand where we got our figures from only to find out the Client spent over $300K in renovations last year that they failed to tell the CPA about.

Most business Owners are guilty of … running their business. As business Owners, we make decisions today that are good for our company and good for our bottom line, with little to no regard of how it affects our tax strategy (and it usually wouldn’t cross our minds to call our CPA in the middle of summer to review something for next April).

#3 – What Can I Do About It?

Step #1 for most business Owners I’ve talked to is:

  • Pound their fist on the desk angrily while complaining about the government
  • When that ceases to provide relief move on to the below Step 2

Step #2 (True Step #1)

For some business Owners, you bit the bullet and made a payment yesterday, for others you either filed extensions or simply filed without making a payment and are going to wait for the dreaded IRS bills to arrive.

In either instance, the good news is that just because tax day has come and gone doesn’t mean your numbers are written in stone. There is over $200B in Federal Tax Incentives allocated to small and mid sized businesses to help offset your liability.

We’ve developed a simple online tool for business owners to check in 30 seconds if you qualify for any Federal Programs.

Click here to find out in 30 Seconds if you qualify for any Federal Tax Incentives.

 

Do you have a ‘Tax Preparer’ or a CPA?

Depending on your answer, you could be getting bad advice which puts more money in the IRS’s coffers (and leaves less in your pocket).

Below is the crux of a typical tax preparer’s opinion regarding Engineering Based Cost Segregation Studies which an experienced CPA would say has kept many commercial property owners from implementing this highly beneficial tax strategy which is effectively encouraged by the IRS.

Here is a typical ‘tax preparer’ statement to commercial property owners:
“You are not getting additional depreciation, you are accelerating depreciation by allocating cost to shorter life. I advise against such a strategy as there can be future tax implications and also there is upfront cost involved.”

For frame of reference, here is the IRS’ view (from www.irs.gov) on cost segregation:
“Buildings and structural components have substantially longer depreciable lives than personal property. Therefore, it is desirable for taxpayers to maximize personal property costs in order to accelerate depreciation deductions and, hence, reduce tax liability.” (source)

Here’s how many experienced CPAs would look at this matter:

The above point of view isn’t considering the bigger picture. For instance, only looking at the (potentially) negative capital gains tax implications associated with cost segregation by itself is ‘missing the forest for the trees’:

  • It is not necessarily true this would be a ‘negative’ as it would depend on the ultimate sale price versus the depreciable cost basis; if the sale price is equal to or less than the depreciable cost basis then the capital gains issue is, well, a non-issue.
  • There is no consideration given to the positive effect on the income tax picture due to cost segregation; this positive effect needs to be weighed against the potentially negative capital gains effect.
  • In general, property owners will benefit from cost segregation if they hold the building for at least 18 months. One reason for this dynamic is that the capital gains tax, even at the 25% ‘re-cap’ rate, is much lower than the typical 35% to 39.6% income tax rate.
  • There is an assumption that the property owner is absolutely giving up all future depreciation benefits in exchange for taking those benefits now. Well, if the owner never replaces carpeting, wiring, plumbing and other such non-structural components, then, ‘yes’, that would be the case. But the reality is that these components will ultimately be replaced (which is the basis for the relatively shorter/accelerated tax-compliant depreciation time-lines for such items). The associated replacement costs can be depreciated.

So, in fact, the depreciation isn’t lost in reality. Plus, only about 20% of the building can be ‘accelerated’…the remainder stays in 39-year S/L.

  • In effect, this is a time-value-of-money/opportunity cost ‘play’. So an owner’s capitalization rate needs to be considered; a critical mass of money in the hands of a good businessperson NOW could feasibly produce a 10% or greater return. An owner’s ability to convert that ‘now cash’ (i.e., cash that becomes available due to cost segregation’s resulting reduction in current income tax) into more cash could easily dwarf the down-the-road bit-by-bit depreciation cost deductions which the owner MAY be passing on.
  • The “upfront costs” for conducting an Engineering Based Cost Segregation Study are barely worthy of factoring into the benefits equation; first, the Study is a business expense and effectively comes at a 35% (+/-) ‘discount’, and secondly, the Study cost can often be less than 10% of the tax benefit (even without the ‘discount’). Most business-minded people would find a project with a minimum 10:1 benefit-to-cost ratio to be worthy of pursuit.

So, do you have a ‘Tax Preparer’ or a CPA? The best way to find out is to ask him or her how they perceive the value of an Engineering Based Cost Segregation Study for a commercial property owner.

To stream a 3-minute video regarding this topic, please click here.

For additional information contact us.

The #1 Lie About Cost Segregation

Cost Segregation on Older Buildings?

It is impossible for me to calculate the number of calls I’ve had with building owners and CPAs on the subject of Cost Segregation. Working some numbers in my head (ok, on my calculator), the number is likely well over 10,000. Out of all those calls there is one particular item that continues to rear its ugly, uninformed head and I can no longer stay silent. I must respond… with vigor!

The “item” in question comes in the form of the following quote, which I’ve heard too often to count:

“You can only do Cost Segregation on a new building or new renovation.”

I have no idea where this rumor started. I hear it weekly and now I am blogging in rebuttal.

First, I will say an unequivocal “Yes”, it is beneficial to have a Cost Segregation study done when you purchase/construct/renovate a new building. In fact, anyone constructing or renovating a commercial property should have a study completed. However, the true power of Cost Segregation is displayed on buildings that are not new!

“But, you can only do Cost Segregation on a new building or new renovation”.

To officially rebut this statement, I will go straight to the source. The first sentence in the IRS Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide – Chapter 6.2 reads:

[box style=”2″][googlefont font=”Sanchez” size=”16px”]”A taxpayer may conduct a cost segregation study on used property and then recompute its depreciation deductions for prior years”. *[/googlefont][/box]

Not only “may” a taxpayer do this but over 75% of our projects are older properties. In the industry we call this the “Catch Up” method, and it can produce powerful results.

Here is an example:

Mr. Client acquires a commercial property for $3,500,000 five years ago and never completed a Cost Segregation Study.

Despite rumors to the contrary, Mr. Client recognizes he may now have an opportunity to benefit from a study (maybe he read this blog post).

Mr. Client hires an expert (GMG for example), who identifies 20% ($700,000) of components that should have been allocated to 5-year life instead of 39 years. Mr. Client jumps for joy when he realizes the IRS will allow him to “catch up” $700,000 of missed accelerated depreciation on his next tax return!

Why doesn’t every building owner and CPA know this?

The answer is simple; it is not their area of expertise. Although some building owners and CPAs have substantial experience with Cost Segregation, most do not. There is a dearth of true educators in this field, which unfortunately leads to much misinformation. These factors have caused countless thousands of building owners to miss out on this powerful tax savings strategy.

All is not lost!

If you own a building and have not had a Cost Segregation study performed, you have not missed the boat. Hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of dollars in tax savings may be available to you. Now that you are aware, let’s see how much you qualify for!  Contact Us today for more information.

* Full Link: http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Cost-Segregation-ATG-Chapter-6-2-Change-in-Accounting-Method

9 out of 10 Commercial Property Investors are Overpaying on Income Taxes

Year after year, the Federal Government has continued to incentivize those who invest in Commercial Property. The IRS has established guidelines that, if ignored, cause commercial real estate investors to pay more in taxes than they should.

What guidelines are being ignored by Commercial Property Investors?
Those revolving around Accelerated Depreciation; known in the taxation world as Property Cost Segregation.

Ramifications of Improper Depreciation Allocation

Most commercial property investors do not truly understand the substantial benefits of accelerated depreciation. This is evidenced by our analysis of thousands of depreciation schedules over the years. We have found less than 10% of investors are properly depreciating their properties. The most common misconception is, “I am going to get this money anyway”. Is this a true or false statement?

Let’s investigate…

  1. Capital Gains vs Ordinary Income Rates
    Although the mechanics of these calculations are not always as simplistic as we will be making it for this example, the short response is – increased depreciation leads to paying taxes at the capital gains rate as opposed to the ordinary income rate. Since capital gains rates are likely much lower than the Investor’s income tax rate, they would benefit from accelerated depreciation.
  2. Time Value of Money
    Simply put, your dollar is worth more today than it will be in the future. A tax dollar saved today therefore is worth more than a tax dollar saved in the future. Why lock up a tax savings in your property for 27-39 years when you can receive it today?
  3. Catch-Up Depreciation
    If you have not completed a Cost Segregation study on your property that you have held for a period of time, did you know that you can capture your entire missed benefit immediately? The IRS allows you to complete a 481 adjustment thus enabling you to catch up all the missed accelerated depreciation into the current tax year. This provision alone could save you hundreds of thousands immediately!
  4. The Power of Cash in hand
    You are a real estate “investor”. This means you understand the investing power of having funds in your hand today. Cash today [in the form of tax savings] enables you to invest in additional properties. The benefits of this are exponential and allow continued growth of your investment portfolio.

Correct allocation of real estate depreciation is essential for Commercial Property Investors to effectively manage their tax situation. Are you one of the 90% who are missing out on opportunities that 10% of your competitors are capturing?

For a free analysis of your Depreciation Schedules, please send an email to solutions@gmgconsulting.net.

Keller Williams Commercial Partnership to Bring Millions in Tax Incentives to Commercial Clients

October 4, 2012 – Keller Williams Commercial, the second largest real estate franchise operation within the U.S., has partnered with Growth Management Group, LLC (GMG), a national cost recovery firm, to provide commercial clients the opportunity to gain hundreds of millions of dollars through specialized tax incentives.

Based on the synergy between both organizations, this partnership will provide clients with every opportunity to make the best investment when purchasing commercial property by reducing taxable income, improving cash flow and ROI.

This partnership will substantiate KW’s commitment to excellence which was confirmed with the 2012 J.D. Power & Associates “How Buyer/Seller Satisfaction Study”, ranking them highest in customer satisfaction.

To date GMG has discovered almost $300 million dollars in refunds and/or incentives for it’s clients.  GMG’s  position as a nationally recognized full service Training, Development and Cost Savings Consulting Firm with a vision to stimulate economies aligns with the same commitment to excellence that KW has established.

For more information about Growth Management Group, LLC, contact:  Kendra Pelch, kpelch@gmgconsulting.net (888) 705.5557, www.gmgsavings.com.

For more information about Keller Williams Commercial Real Estate, contact:  http://www.kwcommercial.com

 

References: http://www.kw.com/kw/pressrelease.html?pressReleaseId=381

 

Who Qualifies for Tax Incentives and Stimulus Money?

We hear a lot about stimulus money these days. We hear who is getting it and what kind of positive things it is doing for the nation. Those stimulus dollars, however, should be working to benefit more local, small to mid-sized businesses. If you fall into this category, your money is likely going to someone else’s business; potentially your competition.

Wading through government forms, even on the simplest level, can be aggravating and time consuming. The idea of ‘free money’ from the government can also be a very scary prospect for skeptical investors and business owners. But there are people out there who have spent a great deal of time learning how these programs work to provide businesses with opportunities that can be extremely beneficial.

Ryan Maddock and Jeremy Harrison of Growth Management Group (GMG) lead a small but growing team of dedicated, positive and knowledgeable staff members that help business owners bridge the daunting gap between not having stimulus money and having it. These funds are not the same as grants which typically need to be used for ultra-specific purposes. Stimulus money can, in many cases, be used as discretionary funds. This frees up the business owner to use the funds as his or her vision sees fit whether it is for new software, equipment, tax offsets, etc. Manufacturing firms in the area, businesses in other states, hotels, restaurants such as Leo’s Coney Island and even Lawrence Moon Funeral Home have capitalized on stimulus money through GMG’s services.

There are currently four programs in full swing for a variety of businesses; manufacturing across the U.S. and in some cases Canada, commercial property owners who have purchased their property within the last twenty years, the HIRE act which pays employers that hire 25 new employees a year (that includes turnaround) and energy credits/energy incentives which is a program that will probably evolve further. Currently the Obama administration has set aside 60 billion dollars for renewable energy. While these programs do have other stipulations and guidelines, GMG has been successfully wading through paperwork for clients in 38 states. Ryan pointed out that stimulus funds have been around since the 1980’s. These programs usually morph into new programs over time and they’re not going anywhere.

If you’re wondering why you’ve not heard much about the eligibility for these funds that is simple to explain; the federal government isn’t always that great at advertising and marketing. As a result, ninety-two percent of companies that qualified for these funds last year didn’t access them and the eight percent that did, were larger companies who tend to have an easier time accessing these sorts of programs

Staying on top of the changes in federal programs is crucial to the success of the service offered by GMG. Fees are based on a percentage of funds obtained, not a flat or hourly rate which business owners have to come out of pocket for. And in many instances, the funds can be applied retroactively from as far back as 2006.

Worried about how your CPA feels about these “too good to be true” stimulus dollars? GMG works with local CPA firms so they understand the hesitancy that comes along with these types of government programs and are able to alleviate those fears. Do you feel a sense of malaise when it comes to paying taxes? There’s good news for you too. Since stimulus funds are made up of tax dollars, this might be your chance to cash in on all the money you’ve doled out over the years to upgrade your business.

See Full Article as Featured in Downtown Revival Magazine.   Click Here

Michigan Company Helps Find Millions in Tax Breaks for Small and Mid Sized Companies

Jeremy Harrison of Growth Management Group interviewed by Michigan Business Magazine about helping small and mid sized businesses find tax breaks and stimulus money.

——–

For many businesspeople, the word “stimulus” might as well be a four-letter word.  For Flint-based Growth Management Group, tax incentives are no dirty word, but rather spell opportunities for businesses to find federal and state incentives to help their bottom lines.

The company seeks out the tax incentives, energy savings and hiring incentives that businesses and many certified public accountants miss during their tax preparation. The company began in the mid 2000s as a lean consulting firm, helping manufacturers remain competitive. By chasing incentives that manufacturers left on the table, GMG stumbled upon a business opportunity as manufacturers in the state were battered by the economic downturn. Sales Manager Jeremy Harrison took time to speak with MiBiz about the 25-person firm and its role turning over the rocks in companies’ books looking for the untapped tax incentives there.

 

MiBiz: How much is out there for companies in terms of untapped incentives?

Harrison: We target the small to medium size business. The state and federal programs are called stimulus incentives when really they are tax based.  If someone is getting ready to write a check (for taxes), they should be looking at every single program to help offset them. The areas of the programs are anywhere from commercial property owners to manufacturing research and development and payroll, such as the HIRE act. That is just part of the hiring incentives out there. There are hundreds of incentives that vary by state and by some municipalities.  For our average client, we can save around $200,000. For some people, it is significant. For others it is a drop in the bucket. We don’t go after the GMs or Fords of the world — they’ve got their own teams of lawyers and accountants looking for these incentives. For a client who may have paid a couple thousand in taxes over the last couple of years, they’re excited about getting that back.

 

MiBiz: What’s preventing companies from tapping these programs themselves?

Harrison: The number one roadblock is that your CPA is not your consultant in these areas. If you have a large firm, they may have an entire division devoted to finding tax incentives. We have 200 attorneys (in our network) and can tap them when needed.

A normal CPA is already buried up to their eyeballs with paperwork for their clients. People assume that their CPAs have a grasp of all the incentives that are out there, (but) almost every CPA says they know the programs are out there. They have been to a seminar and know about them, but are they taking it to the next level and able to file all the necessary paperwork? Standard CPAs don’t have time to dig into those areas without some help. We help the CPAs consult with their clients.

We don’t want Michigan businesses to lose money because of the disconnect that is out there.

MiBiz: The stimulus was a major campaign issue, with many business interests coming out in opposition to the ARRA. Are you encountering reluctance to take part?

Harrison: We hear that “we don’t want any of that Obama money.” There has been stimulus money out there as long as there has been a United States. Nobody paid attention until there was the economic downturn. Until the government came in with TARP and ARRA, no one paid much attention.

Many of these incentives came in the tax reforms of 1986. A lot happened in both Bush Administrations. Manufacturing incentives have been around almost as long as there have been manufacturers. The government makes (these incentives) extremely difficult to get. We have the expertise. That is not money that is out in the middle of nowhere. We are lowering the amount of money you are paying in.

We do have a challenge that customers have to know that there are incentives for them. Mileage is a deduction on a tax return. Now imagine if (the government) said that you have to have a 500-page technical report for that deduction — that is what we’re talking about.

MiBiz: Where do you see opportunities going forward?

Harrison: The manufacturing credits sunset at the end of the year. It is annually updated and used as a political bargaining chip. They never sunset, but it has always been threatened. President Obama himself said that he wants to make these credits permanent. He said that, but it hasn’t happened.

I see the hiring incentives as becoming increasingly important. With the economy and unemployment rate where it is, the government really wants to be seen helping improve the employment picture.

On the energy side, everyone under the sun knows energy is a hot button issue. Government is pushing a number of mandates about renewable energy, federal and state incentives are being talked about at various levels. We truly feel that energy will be at the top of the chart of things that we are going after for clients.


Featured in MiBiz Magazine
By Nathan Peck | MiBiz 

For Full Article Click Here